Enviado por Xulu (no verificado) el 18 Enero, 2010 - 07:46.
Will there anytime be a adaptation (for modchip users) that does not crave the custom IOSto be installed (or if it is not an cIOS that is not needed, my bad.) MB2-632?
If not, is it because in your point of appearance this is advised hypocritical to abutment modchip owners MB2-633?
Im animated that this will be appear but aswell a bit dissapointed. If you accommodate the aperture [indirectly] to humans like wanki, dont you anticipate there is a accident of anyone application it to advance a softmod? In my opinion PW0-104, I anticipate you guys achievement that by giving the “sceners”* a patch, you will achievement that they will never go aback and try to acquisition that hidden ciggerate. Im apologetic if this seems like bashing. I just wish to apperceive the official stanse RH202.
P.S.S, how do you guys accord with humans like Wanki? do you/have you confront(ed) him?
»
Responder
Quién soy
Javier Carranza, desarrollador de software libre, tecnófilo y emprendedor
Will there anytime be a
Will there anytime be a adaptation (for modchip users) that does not crave the custom IOSto be installed (or if it is not an cIOS that is not needed, my bad.) MB2-632?
If not, is it because in your point of appearance this is advised hypocritical to abutment modchip owners MB2-633?
Im animated that this will be appear but aswell a bit dissapointed. If you accommodate the aperture [indirectly] to humans like wanki, dont you anticipate there is a accident of anyone application it to advance a softmod? In my opinion PW0-104, I anticipate you guys achievement that by giving the “sceners”* a patch, you will achievement that they will never go aback and try to acquisition that hidden ciggerate. Im apologetic if this seems like bashing. I just wish to apperceive the official stanse RH202.
P.S.S, how do you guys accord with humans like Wanki? do you/have you confront(ed) him?